Denver Direct: McKinley Rides Again
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Sunday, November 9, 2008
McKinley Rides Again
Congratulations to Wes McKinley, who successfully won the State House District 64 race against the Republican challenger Torres, by over 17%. McKinley was back at the Capitol the next day, continuing to work on the issues, and planning a concert during the upcoming Western Stock Show (more later).
I was pleased that he was able to run the commercials I created for him, which, according to Wes, were a “major factor” in his victory. I think he won because the people of his district truly support what he does for them. I mean, check out Prowers County below. How often do you see a 100% win?
Colorado State House District 64 Results
Wes McKinley vs. Ken Torres
Results: District 64, 100% reporting ( 69 precincts )
Candidate | Percentage | Votes |
Wes McKinley (Dem) | 58.7% | 15,305 |
Ken Torres (GOP) | 41.2% | 10,738 |
Results by County |
||
Baca | ||
McKinley (Dem) | 72.6% | 1,588 |
Torres (GOP) | 27.3% | 597 |
Bent | ||
McKinley (Dem) | 62.7% | 1,181 |
Torres(GOP) | 37.2% | 702 |
Huerfano | ||
McKinley (Dem) | 62.8% | 1,974 |
Torres (GOP) | 37.1% | 1,168 |
Las Animas | ||
Torres (GOP) | 51.3% | 3,364 |
McKinley (Dem) | 48.6% | 3,182 |
Otero | ||
McKinley (Dem) | 61.2% | 4,757 |
Torres (GOP) | 38.7% | 3,014 |
Prowers | ||
McKinley (Dem) | 100.0% | 2,623 |
Torres (GOP) | 0.0% | 0 |
at 8:47 AM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Post Comments (Atom)
Editor's note.
Submit for publication: I consider any emails I receive to be publishable unless otherwise indicated e.g. (FYI ONLY, DO NOT PUBLISH, NOT FOR PUBLICATION. ETC.) [email protected]
BLOG ARCHIVE
CONTACT US
Got a tip? Information? Press release? Contact us by email -Editor@DenverDirect.tv
Who we are:
Editor
Gerald Trumbule
Featured Contributors
Linda Drake
CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE
All of the work on this site, including the original YouTube videos by www.DenverDirect.tv, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License. Click on the symbol above for explanation.
0 comments:
Post a Comment